Search for: "SPENCER v. ARNOLD."
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2024, 6:40 am
("Aldi") for the reasons set out in Marks and Spencer Plc v Aldi [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:43 am
At the end of last month, the long-awaited judgment in the Interflora v Marks and Spencer case on trade mark infringement as it relates to keyword advertising was delivered by Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
The original action is Interflora, Inc., Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), 22 May 2009. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:13 am
To his acute embarrassment, the IPKat has only just, and rather belatedly, got round to reviewing the fourth edition of Performers' Rights by Richard Arnold (now Mr Justice Arnold, of the Patents Court for England and Wales). [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
Earlier today this Kat posted this note on Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), the latest in a line of important trade mark rulings from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
"Arnold J however qualified question 3(b) as follows, at para. 20: "... [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
Never too late 16 [week ending Sunday 19 October] -- The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Nampak Plastics Europe Ltd v Alpla UK Ltd | Former Eagle member claims infringement of his name in the US | The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Specsavers v Asda | A change in format for the European Patent Attorney exam | Reflections over IP5 patent filing figures | ‘Common Sense For Copyright’… [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Goes back 4 years to Obama v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
In its June 14, 2017 decision in Monti v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
It was in the course of this nostalgic meander through the warm and sunny days of July that he stumbled on a case which is actually quite interesting, and even important if you like beer and roses: Samuel Smith Old Brewery v Philip Lee (trading as Cropton Brewery) [2011] EWHC 1879 (Ch), a ruling by Mr Justice Arnold, Chancery Division, England and Wales, 22 July 2011. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
| Anne Frank's diary & geoblocking | Magic Leap lampoons Google Glass | Arnold's decision in Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT v Generics| US Trade Secrets Act passes House | Publishing and the Machine| DSM Communication on Platforms leaked! [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
In Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 Lewison LJ referred to Neutrogena [1996] R.P.C. 473 that:"...There is passing off even if most of the people are not fooled most of the time but enough are for enough of the time. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
Springtime is the time for flowers, which makes it totally appropriate that the first little buds should begin to appear in Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, a reference to the Court of the European Union (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
See American Bar Association v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
The trial judge, Mr Justice Arnold, painstakingly analysed both the relevant law and the facts, before referring a raft of ten questions for preliminary rulings. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 3:01 am
They are:Case T-278/04 Jabones Pardo v OHIM - Quimi Romar (YUKI). [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
In addition to the congressional speakers, NSSTA's educational program featured exceptional structured settlement and settlement planning presentations: Industry Update and Looking Forward - Transitioning NSSTA Presidents Chris Diamantis and Dan Durbin offered their strategic analyses; "All Things Considered" - NSSTA's legal committee has upgraded the quality and scope of its educational contributions: Michael Miller summarized Spencer v. [read post]
