Search for: "SSA (Court Use Only)"
Results 241 - 260
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-1092 : August 29, 2011 Judge: Colloton Areas of Law: Family Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits, Trusts & Estates Appellee sued the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA), seeking review of the SSA's denial of benefits to her daughter. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Advocates to be the only recognized class of persons entitled to practice law - Subject to the provisions of this Act and any rules made thereunder, there shall, as from the appointed day, be only one class of persons entitled to practise the profession of law, namely, advocates. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:14 am
Supreme Court, the majority concluded that the SSA’s interpretation of the statute was reasonable and entitled to deference. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:51 pm
A recent opinion from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in Apone v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
In addition, the plaintiff's reliance on the Social Security Administration (SSA) determination of disability provided no basis for concluding that the deceased was disabled under the plan as the plaintiff failed to show that the Plan used a similar definition of disability as the SSA. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:29 am
District Courts). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:30 am
In addition, the Supreme Court, in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:10 pm
As a result, he was barred from using the new evidence on appeal. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:18 am
District Court, Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
An associate of mine, Andrea Dunbar, has written a very useful piece about just how to do this, and even more useful - where to go to actually change all the documents. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
An associate of mine, Andrea Dunbar, has written a very useful piece about just how to do this, and even more useful - where to go to actually change all the documents. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:26 pm
Then, and only then, are the remaining cases randomized. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 5:38 am
Well, if the SSA can prove to the bankruptcy court that you fraudulently obtained the overpayments in question, you are up the creek without a paddle. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:37 am
Typical provisions of English-only proposals include: (1) requiring English to be the official language of the United States; (2) requiring all federal government documents to be printed in English-only; and (3) prohibiting the use of funds that creates an entitlement to services provided in a language other than English. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:25 pm
You could only deduct $4,000 from your income for the alimony paid in 2010. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
The SSA’s policy prohibits its employees from using the databases for non-business reason. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Courts have misinterpreted the language. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:05 pm
The court reasoned that SSA’s policy established the scope of Rodriguez’ authorized excess. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:12 pm
In Rodriguez, the court upheld the criminal CFAA conviction of defendant Roberto Rodriguez, a former Social Security Administration (“SSA”) telephone service representative, because he accessed confidential and sensitive files for “a non-business reason. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
Rodriguez was a Social Security Administration employee who used the SSA computers for purely personal reasons. [read post]
