Search for: "STANDARD PARTS COMPANY v. D & J INVESTMENT COMPANY"
Results 1 - 20
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
In recognition of the importance of high-quality audits, both domestically and abroad, Congress has taken significant action on at least two occasions in the past twenty years—with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”)[6] and the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (“HFCAA”) in 2020[7]—to provide centralized oversight and standards for the accounting profession that audits public companies (and registered broker-dealers) and to… [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 4:04 pm
N & D Investment Corp., No. 08-20472-CIV, 2008 WL 4372889, at *4 (S.D.Fla. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am
(“HOM”), Hayman Investments, L.L.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:06 am
© 2013 Alexander J. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Before I begin, let me make my standard disclaimer – the views I express today are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of the SEC or my fellow Commissioners. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
Part V then considers the governance implications of the market activities of the NSWF. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Colin J. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm
That case, Stoyas v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am
Bryant D. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 4:07 am
Lowinger v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
The personal benefit standard was in fact an important part of the U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:49 am
Arsenal v Reed). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
”If there were any doubt about the role of the wife as a director, that was done away with by Debelle J in Group 4 Industries Pty Ltd v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Titles V and VI make it easier for companies to remain private (i.e., avoid having to become a public reporting company). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:54 pm
Judge Wood, together with Judges William J. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
The standard tactic is an oldie but goodie--scare campaigns that such measures will have a negative effect on value (see here). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 3:31 pm
As detailed in an April 27, 2018 Law 360 article by J. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
