Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. and J. J."
Results 1 - 20
of 4,622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Manny Pacquiao v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:29 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:24 pm
Interested in applying for a business B-1 visa? [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:48 am
(FINRA Case #2013036799501) J. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:42 am
J & J Sports states that it is licensed as a distributor of the "Ruiz/Hamer" broadcast. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
See points [2.5] and [2(b)] of the reasons and the order, respectively. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:37 pm
J. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:57 pm
In this live stream, attorney Jacob J. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:21 pm
About André J. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
”); Beau J. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:00 pm
As for those landlords who allegedly violate J-51, “CPLR 901 (b) permits… plaintiffs to utilize the class action mechanism to recover compensatory overcharges. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:48 pm
We agree.Judge Moore disagreed on the chemical bond part:I join Judge Lourie’s opinion except for Parts II-A-2and II-B-2. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 5:09 pm
[… There is] no need to go beyond the principles considered in the well-established jurisprudence summarized in J 7/90 and also endorsed in J 6/02. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:54 am
It's interesting that only Sotomayor and Ginsburg dissent. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Insofar as the European patent has not yet been granted (R 16(1)(b)) this third party may, no later than three months after the decision recognising its entitlement has become final (R 16(1)(a)), in respect of Contacting States designated in the EP application in which the decision has been taken or recognised or must be recognised on the basis of the Protocol on Recognition:(a) prosecute the EP application as its own application in place of the applicant (A 61(1)(a));(b)… [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
The Applicant requested confirmation of the priority right being in force.The EPO then issued a notification of loss of rights under Rule 112(1) EPC stating that the "decision by the receiving Office to restore the right of priority based on the criterion of unintentionality has no effect in proceedings before the EPO (R. 49ter.1(b) PCT) and no valid request under Rule 49ter.2 PCT has been filed". [read post]
