Search for: "STATE OF CAL., ETC. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Your Service was “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
And yet, his involvement in the Denton case (as well as other cases, such as silicone gel breast implant cases, thimerosal cases, etc.) suggest that he is willing to lend aid and support to judgments for plaintiffs when the evidence is inconclusive. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
And yet, his involvement in the Denton case (as well as other cases, such as silicone gel breast implant cases, thimerosal cases, etc.) suggest that he is willing to lend aid and support to judgments for plaintiffs when the evidence is inconclusive. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
-John 192 Cal.App.4th 90 (2011) MEGAN KUCKER et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]