Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN DOW" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2010, 1:12 pm by jefhenninger
Dow announced the indictment today of two ruling members of the New York-based Lucchese crime family and 32 other members and associates, including alleged current and former top New Jersey capos Ralph V. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  As fate might have it, the question of market share liability in New Jersey was governed by a case, Shackil v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:04 am by Russell Beck
Yuan Li, a former research chemist for Sanofi-Aventis, plead guilty to stealing trad secrets in federal court in New Jersey. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:55 am by John Lewis
Posted by John LewisCo-Authored by: Dustin Dow A unanimous Supreme Court held on Monday that when a party agrees that an arbitrator should decide if an agreement authorizes class arbitration, that party cannot later seek judicial intervention if it disagrees with the resulting award. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
" The letter was also signed by Senators Daniel Akaka of Hawaii, Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Robert Casey Jr. of Pennsylvania, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Charles Schumer of New York, and Jon Tester of Montana. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Zimmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkrecently issued in a civil case:  Robinson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
Eastman Kodak Co., 726 A.2d 955 (New Jersey Super. 1999). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958-9 (3d Cir. 1990) (if New Jersey law requires plaintiffs to show that it is more likely than not that Bendectin caused the injury, and if plaintiffs rely solely on epidemiological analysis in order to avoid summary judgment, the relative risk from the epidemiological data relied upon will, at a minimum, have to exceed 2) Daubert v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]