Search for: "STATE OF NEW YORK v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
LEXIS 57317 (ND NY, April 4, 2018), a New York federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his amended complaint that contends he was served meals that do not comply with requirements for Halal food.In McLendon v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
. **** CoinAlts East CFM is a founding sponsor of the one-day symposium for digital asset managers in New York on April 19, 2018. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Key Findings New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has announced that his state and others will file a lawsuit challenging the federal tax law’s $10,000 cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:49 pm
New York State Thruway Auth., et al., and VIZIO, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
The flamboyant Ann Lohman Restell of New York, for example, who was popularly known as “Madame Restell,” maintained a highly profitable abortion business serving a genteel, middle- and upper- class clientele. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:50 pm
Zarda v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
Therefore, employers subject to Title VII, particularly those in the Second Circuit (i.e., Connecticut, New York and Vermont), should know about this opinion and consider how and whether it may apply to them. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm
Canada (Attorney General) Fair Dealing Support for News Reporting and Public Debate: The Case of Warman and National Post v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 10:38 am
The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals covers Connecticut, New York and Vermont, while the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals includes areas of Indiana, Illinois, and Wisconsin.Californians are fortunate that the state’s Fair Employment and Housing Act already includes “sexual orientation” among protected employee traits for employers of five or more. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:09 pm
On February 26, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which has jurisdiction over Vermont, New York and Connecticut, ruled that discrimination based on sexual orientation can be sex discrimination. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 11:26 am
” Employers operating within the Second Circuit – comprising New York, Connecticut, and Vermont – already should have in place policies prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination because those state laws expressly prohibit such conduct. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:25 am
Connecticut is in that federal circuit (along with New York and Vermont). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
Altitude Express, makes clear that employees working within the Second Circuit (New York, Connecticut and Vermont) have access to the remedial measures and administrative process under Title VII, a federal law. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
Photo by Matias Rengel on Unsplash Yesterday, the 2nd Circuit federal court of appeals (which covers New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) held that “Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation as discrimination ‘because of … sex. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
Photo by Matias Rengel on Unsplash Yesterday, the 2nd Circuit federal court of appeals (which covers New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) held that “Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation as discrimination ‘because of … sex. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
” The states of New York, Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Washington, and the District of Columbia: The states and Washington, D.C., argue that agency fees “are important to maintaining the labor-management model that many states rely on to ensure the… [read post]
