Search for: "STATE V. BERNAL" Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
State Department, the group will be based largely in Poland and bring together multinational experts, including war crimes prosecutors and forensic specialists. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Paul Bernal has published his criticisms of the UK government’s new anti-encryption campaign, finding it to be “based on many false assumptions, but the biggest of all of these is the whole idea that hiding is a bad thing. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Paul Bernal has a piece on BT’s new “walk me home” proposal, which would provide women with real time tracking as they walk home. [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
– Paul Bernal https://t.co/HP1FHubcLY 2020-05-09 Sign-in wrap agreement enforced in Babcock v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Paul Bernal’s new book “What do we know and what should we do about internet privacy? [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
EU member states have rejected a draft of the ePrivacy Regulation. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
Jaeger VA Regional Office: Cleveland, Ohio Veteran’s Representative at BVA: The American Legion Date of BVA Decision: July 20, 2017 Date of CAVC Decision: July 12, 2019 The post PRECEDENTIAL CAVC CASE ALERT: Buffington v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm by Chris Attig
And Judge Greenberg encapsulated well the obvious concern the majority side-stepped in his dissenting opinion: “Section 3.654(b) does not merely “create a mechanism by which VA manages compensation benefits when veterans return to active duty,” as the majority states, it also creates an unnecessary and inappropriate impediment to a veteran receiving benefits he has already established entitlement to. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
Broadcasting Paul Bernal’s Blog has a piece on “Impartiality and the BBC …” Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation  The Columbia Journalism Review has a post “Do technology companies care about journalism? [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:01 am by SHG
The case is called Riley’s American Heritage Farms v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Paul Bernal has covered the curious incident of “the fake vicar” on Newsnight and draws pointed analogies to the issue of outlet credibility and integrity. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:03 am by Chris Attig
Bernal, Attorney Appellant’s Opening Brief Appellee’s Response Brief Appellant’s Reply Brief   #3:  English v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Paul Bernal’s Blog has a post on data retention which argues that the process should be encouraged. [read post]