Search for: "STATE V. PENA" Results 1 - 20 of 377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
 Cuba represents a most interesting variant of Marxist-Leninist state organization. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Biedscheid and Pena (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; State Tort; Anti-Injunction Act) Butler v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Debra Perlin
Impermissible outside influences include both attempts at witness tampering and juror animus, such as in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 3:52 pm by Amy Howe
He asked the justices to put his execution on hold and decide whether the court’s 2017 decision in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:13 am
  This has been intensified as the Cuban intelligentsia has become more deeply embedded within institutions in and around the Caribbean, forging complex intellectual links in and around the state--links that cannot be ignored. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm by bndmorris
Gonzalez’s review The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Pena-Irala recognized the statute as a human rights jurisdiction vehicle, granting aliens the opportunity to sue Americans and foreigners in the United States for alleged crimes against humanity and similar abuses. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 5:30 am by Peter Charles
This case also demonstrates a common issue in law – not everything is black and white; there is a lot of gray area. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]