Search for: "STATE v STRAWN" Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2012, 2:59 am
 No doubt, BPI's counsel, Winston & Strawn, Chicago's oldest law firm took every word of that 1995 9th Circuit opinion into account when it was writing BPI's lengthy complaint filed against ABC News in South Dakota state court Thursday. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Leland E. Beck
The Supreme Court of the United States declined today to end the judicial practice of deferring to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations in “friend of the court” briefs filed with a court in Christopher v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:23 pm
People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney General of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by Kali Borkoski
United States Law Offices of Mitchell N. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746 [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 8:03 am
' Ron Friedmann (Prism Legal Consulting), David Hambourger (Winston & Strawn), and Eugene Stein (White & Case) are presenting on the topic. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Supreme Court ruling in "Quon" highlights importance of employer technology-usage and privacy policiesPrepared by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLPOn June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided City of Ontario v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Where a sophisticated client imposes a strategic decision on counsel, the client’s action absolves the attorney from liability for malpractice (Town of North Hempstead v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 28 AD3d 746  [2006]; Stolmeier v Fields, 280 AD2d 342 [2001]). [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An exception exists and liability may be extended where a plaintiff sufficiently pleads acts of fraud, collusion, malicious acts or other special circumstances (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, 119 AD3d 442 [Pt Dept 2014]). [read post]