Search for: "STATE v. ACKERMAN"
Results 61 - 80
of 325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:05 pm
Ackerman, 831 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2016); United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Much of Masur’s book focuses on debates over state law and state-level civil rights reform efforts, whereas my collection focuses on federal law and national-level constitutional reform efforts. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Yes, the Article V process leading to those Amendments was in some respects procedurally irregular, as Bruce Ackerman has shown. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm
It is specialists who tend to concentrate instead of his actual decisions as a practicing politician, whether candidate for higher office or as President of the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Defendant’s failure to lodge a timely, specific objection to the billing was insufficient to rebut any inference of an agreement to pay the stated amount (see Shaw v Silver, 95 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The Constitution specifies that when the President of the United States is tried, “the Chief Justice shall preside. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
” (Ackerman v Kesselman, 100 AD3d 577, 579 [2d Dept 2012].) [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
Bruce Ackerman and Democratic Rep. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
He views Justice Marshall, in the 1803 Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
To my way of thinking, in stating their claims they run this point right into the ground (I’m presenting only part of this list):“(1) We treat the Constitution as a legal text, originally enacted in the late eighteenth century. (2) This constitutional text regulates the selection of legal officials, even when such regulations are unpopular or contrary to tradition. (3) Actors in our legal system don’t acknowledge, and indeed reject, any official legal breaks or… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Perhaps he is reluctant to embrace the Wilsonian view for the reasons stated above. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Just as importantly, perhaps, states perturbed by the undoubtedly correct decision by the Supreme Court in Chisholm v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Bruce Ackerman and others have suggested that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments may not have met Article V’s requirements, but attained legitimacy through other means.Similarly, it may mean that the Nineteenth Amendment and the Equal Rights Amendment can be legitimized through means other than Article V. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 7:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
