Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL"
Results 81 - 100
of 631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2022, 4:14 pm
I speak here of the North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering dispute (Moore v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (in 2004) and Gaffney v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
Professor Amar and Professor Dorf plan to explore key matters being considered by the Court, including Second Amendment issues in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
For example, in each of the year’s two blockbuster cases—one expanding gun rights (New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
After Dillon v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:39 am
The district court in Dart remanded a removed case back to state court. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court suggests why that is a mistake on North Carolina’s part.In Berger v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
For example, in the seminal case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 8:27 am
Smith and Akhil Amar). [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
Raich, United States v. [read post]
