Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL" Results 141 - 160 of 631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 7:52 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Congress acts, in short, against the background of the total corpus juris of the states in much the way that a state legislature acts against the background of the common law, assumed to govern unless changed by legislation.One might think that patent law is entirely federal, but Professor Amar (who has also reviewed an earlier edition of the casebook) liked to remind us that federal law is never in a vacuum.Amar often cited a 1957 article by the late Paul Mishkin, The… [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Before teaching, Professor Amar spent a few years at the firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging) In a recent posting, Ilya Somin says the following: “Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]