Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL" Results 161 - 180 of 631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The proposed lines dividing each of the six new states are provisional; under Draper’s proposal, over the next few years, any county that adjoins any of the proposed states can choose to become part of that contiguous state, provided that the counties that are provisionally in that neighboring state also agree to add such a county. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
To be sure, Obamacare subsidies in federal-exchange states were taking place before the Court affirmed their validity in King v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts can revisit their prior rulings, higher courts can change the legal landscape against which lower courts make decisions (as the Supreme Court in fact did in the immigration regulation setting in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Before teaching, Professor Amar spent a few years at the firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
U.S.), and the second is a case about how readily a State can discriminate among messages on personalized automobile license plates (Walker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 8:52 am
It's by UC Hastings College of Law Professor Vikram David Amar. [read post]
” Famous cases in which the Court has held that speech was impermissibly compelled include: West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]