Search for: "STATE v. BAXTER"
Results 101 - 120
of 519
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2018, 4:16 pm
"A defendant need not show [either] a pattern of discrimination'" (People v Anthony, 152 AD3d 1048, 1050, 61 N.Y.S.3d 151 [3d Dept 2017]) or, as the court stated here, "a systematic approach by the prosecution. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:25 am
Silvestri v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
The state court agreed, and when the case was removed to federal district court (because the parties are citizens of different states), the federal court inherited the seal. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:22 am
Specifically, Judge Newman's concerns involve separation of powers issues and accordingly, are different from the issues raised in Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 8:25 am
Sanchez, In re Baxter, and Zeran v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:44 am
Baxter, The First Modern Codification of the Law of War: Francis Lieber and General Orders No. 100, 25 International Review of the Red Cross 171 (1964). [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Baxter v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
Baxter v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6887, and Baxter v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Second, with respect to the Caremark claim, the more recent exposition of Caremark in Stone v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
In a case in which there is some doubt about the claimant’s title to the patent itself, the suggestion is that title has to be perfected by the judgment of the court – for example, ensuring that the legal owner must be joined to the proceedings (see Baxter v NPB [1998] RPC 250). [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 1:00 pm
"In contrast, on October 26, 2017, a California appellate court handed down its decision in Baxter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 9:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
