Search for: "STATE v. BLACK" Results 41 - 60 of 9,992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm
At least in the context of numbers of one race v. another race in a district, regardless of the shape of the district, states may have to take into account the total percentage of a minority and make sure their redistricting does not dilute that race's voting power. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Media Bias, Perspective, and State Repression: The Black Panther Party. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
Ohio (1961), applying the exclusionary rule to the states; Gideon v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:23 am by scanner1
STATE OF MONTANA, Defendant, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Christopher Tyner
Late last week the United States Supreme Court decided Flowers v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 10:51 am by Pam Brannon
Another prominent Black Atlanta attorney, Howard Moore, Jr., was involved in the landmark case Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:25 am by Matthew Campbell
The bill would have reaffirmed the rights of Native American students like Black to wear tribal regalia at graduations, a critical protection in the state with the second highest concentration of American Indians. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:00 am by Riley Macdonald
Jury to Decide if Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 Image Infringes Wrestler’s Poster Huffman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:19 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Interesting article in the ABA  Journal which examines State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Cross-posted from SCOTUS Blog, where this essay is part of its special Black History Month coverage:In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm by Matthew Nied
In the companion cases of Breeden v Black, 2012 SCC 19 (“Breeden”) and Éditions Écosociété Inc. et al. v Banro Corp., 2012 SCC 18 (“Banro”), the Supreme Court of Canada clarified the manner in which courts should determine whether to exercise jurisdiction over multijurisdictional defamation claims involving foreign defendants. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:03 pm
Today, the International Court of Justice concluded its public hearings in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. [read post]