Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 181 - 200
of 903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
”); Keen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:28 am
He cited the cases of South Cambridgeshire District Council v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
” Briefly: At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen discusses the pending cert petition in Evans v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen explains why “this session could be one of the busiest in history for LGBT-related concerns. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:58 pm
Yes, I know, the policy says what it says, and it's primarily the insured who's required to have the requisite amount of insurance coverage, and it's possible at least in theory that the policy here could have been part of a $750,000 "package" of insurance that satisfied the statutory minimums.But I nonetheless have a very keen sense of what went on here. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy writes that if the Supreme Court rules for the “faithless elector” in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
Is he right about the danger of the state? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:27 am
Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011) – Read judgment The high court has ruled that the coalition government’s cancellation of Labour’s school building program in 6 areas was unlawful. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
Not going out of state. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
If the Court is keen to preserve its subsidiary role, some better indicia for national courts and police would have been of greater assistance. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
Michael Silverleaf QC also made submissions on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:54 am
” State antitrust enforcers have a keen interest in ensuring that generic exclusion results from the strength of the patent rather than rivals’ common interest in eliminating competition and sharing the spoils at the consumers’ expense. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:19 am
” [29], he is keen to play down the importance of the likelihood of the defendant (rather than the tortfeasor) having the means to compensate the victim. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
” Briefly: At the Keen News Service, Lisa Keen looks back at last week’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Div. 1996) Keene Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 9:55 am
The court found that the state had a compelling interest in requiring the test.In Thomas v. [read post]
