Search for: "STATE v. ORTIZ"
Results 61 - 80
of 581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2021, 4:42 pm
IndiaSaket v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
State, 903 P.2d 574, 575, 577. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
State, 903 P.2d 574, 575, 577. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 3:40 pm
The justices also declined review in Ortiz-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:59 am
These and other petitions of the week are below: Ortiz v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:20 pm
In Ortiz-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:32 pm
See Ortiz-Espinosa v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
App. at 513-14; see also State v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:31 am
On the other side has been the Marxist-Leninist camp, joined by elements of developing states. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 3:30 am
Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 6:02 am
, Ortiz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 7:11 am
That procedural tactic was foreclosed by the Supreme Court in Ortiz v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:55 pm
Helpful Links Leymis Velasquez, et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
Ortiz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
The case is entitled Ortiz et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
