Search for: "STRICKLAND v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Thus, for years, the case distribution schedule has consisted exclusively of distribution of cases on these “paid lists” and “IFP lists. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Last on our list of old business is a pair of two-time relists: Woods v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
M-Edge Accessories LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Shaw, 13-897, a state-on-top habeas case that asked whether, in an ineffective assistance claim, “a state appellate court’s holding that an omitted state law issue ultimately lacked merit precludes a federal habeas court from later finding either deficient performance or prejudice” under Strickland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
Not wanting to be too precipitous in its handling of the case, which has been pending at the Court for a mere sixteen years, Monday’s order list merely specified that the case “has been set for oral argument in due course. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
Louisiana, 13-8915, which comes to us from the A-list’s playground of the moment. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
McNeal 13-963Issue: Whether, contrary to Strickland v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:16 pm
In Newman v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
I share it on various list servers too .. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Madigan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:30 pm
Foster12-420Issue: Whether a federal habeas court must grant Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) deference to both components of a state court’s merits adjudication of a defendant’s Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm
The parties dispute whether SunSource should have appeared on that list before June 19, 2001, and whether Strickland himself should have put SunSource on the list. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
We have further recognized that the purpose of providing assistance of counsel “is simply to ensure that criminal defendants receive a fair trial,” Strickland v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Evans v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a substantial defense” – rather than the standard… [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Latif v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Daman v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:45 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Cases involving lawyers from Goldstein & Russell (listed without regard to the likelihood of being granted): Pickering v. [read post]
