Search for: "Salinger v. Colting"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 11:39 am
Salinger v Colting 2d Circuit Appeal of Prelim Injunction Decision [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 5:39 am
Copyright aficianados may remember Colting from the 2010 Second Circuit decision Salinger v Colting, where he was facing allegations of copyright infringement over an unauthorized sequel to J.D. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:32 am
That presumption has now been jettisoned, and this is consistent with the Second Circuit’s famed decision in the Salinger v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 11:22 am
Following the lead of the 2d Circuit in Salinger v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:10 am
Salinger v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:39 am
Goter Holden Caulfield Grows Up: Salinger v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:45 pm
Colting and the Cariou v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:17 am
Bernstein, review Salinger v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 1:28 pm
"The core of the argument seems to be that, in his book, "Colting takes ... the seemingly authentic and fiercely independent Holden, and 'adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message' to create a new work of fiction -- a new story that is entirely 'transformative'" (p. 41, quoting the Supreme Court's decision in Campbell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 11:50 am
Under Salinger v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 7:36 am
Of special note to copyright fans, one of the defendants here is Fredrik Colting, of Salinger v Colting fame. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:45 am
For example, in Salinger v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
See also Salinger v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:13 pm
Hathitrust, discussed below), the sequel rights to Catcher in the Rye, (Salinger v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:13 pm
Hathitrust, discussed below), the sequel rights to Catcher in the Rye, (Salinger v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 12:13 pm
Hathitrust, discussed below), the sequel rights to Catcher in the Rye, (Salinger v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:30 am
Also last week, a majority panel in last week's case of Avid v Crystal Import Corporation found there had been inequitable conduct on the part of the applicants. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Colting and the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Flexible Lifeline Systems v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:34 am
Colting, 607 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2010). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:39 am
See Salinger v. [read post]
