Search for: "Samples v. First Health Group Corp. et al"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
The expression ‘P=.05’ means that there is one chance in twenty that a result showing increased risk was caused by a sampling error—i.e., that the randomly selected sample accidentally turned out to be so unrepresentative that it falsely indicates an elevated risk. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Alcoa Inc., et al, Civil No. 2:10-cv-05051-GW (PLAx) (C.D. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The approach taken is to highlight the perspectives of the courts by setting out sample extracts from leading cases on important areas of patent law which reflect the courts’ views about the relationship between patent law concepts and innovation. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Identifying the Meaning of the Claim The first step in determining what information is needed to substantiate a claim for a dietary supplement is to understand the meaning of the claim and to clearly identify each implied and express claim. [read post]
