Search for: "Samsung Semiconductor Inc. "
Results 1 - 20
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 4:44 pm
The appellees were SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNGELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNGSEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and SAMSUNG AUSTINSEMICONDUCTOR LLC. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:38 pm
On July 15, 2011, Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea and Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (“SLA”) (collectively, “Samsung”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:02 pm
According to the Order, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. consented to the motion. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:15 am
Among those cases, note: Peter Pedersen has continued to add defendants to what promises to be a wide-ranging assertion campaign based on a single patent covering organizing email lists; Samsung has settled a tranche of IPRs against Trenchant Blade Technologies (associated with Tanit Ventures, Inc., with old patents, presumably with a backend, from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation TSMC); Google filed more inter partes reviews (IPRs) against Jawbone (the… [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:13 am
’s (“Samsung”) motion to disqualify Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
James Gildea issued Order No. 33 denying a motion brought by nonparties Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, and Transcend Information, Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:38 pm
(“NVIDIA”); Asustek Computer Inc.; ASUS Computer International, Inc.; BFG Technologies, Inc.; Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:20 pm
” The complaint further alleges that Samsung has sold for importation 34nm semiconductor devices, including at least a 34nm NAND flash memory chip found in Apple Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 12:13 pm
About Unidym, Inc. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Whether Rambus had exhausted its rights under the Barth patents in view of certain “Samsung memory products. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:19 pm
” Respondents Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC opposed Samsung’s motion. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:22 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Rambus Inc. and the Respondents are NVIDIA Corp., Asustek Computer Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., BFG Technologies, Inc., Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 4:15 am
The PTAB saw new IPRs filed against Advanced Coding (filed by Samsung), XR Communications (filed by Ericsson) and Semiconductor Design (filed by Cadence Design Systems). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 4:15 am
The PTAB saw new IPRs filed against Advanced Coding (filed by Samsung), XR Communications (filed by Ericsson) and Semiconductor Design (filed by Cadence Design Systems). [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm
Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
[1] http://www.iphone-my.com/news/samsung-apple-parts-2012-20132014/ [2] Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:19 am
"Advanced Micro Devices Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:15 am
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) saw just 22 inter partes reviews (IPRs) this week; a few parties walked away from their patents, including Litl LLC [TRI Ventures, Inc.], after a challenge by Microsoft. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:25 pm
According to the Order, Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. [read post]
