Search for: "Samuel Chang" Results 41 - 60 of 2,709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Do “we” ourselves often change our minds when reading legal opinions authored by, say, Samuel Alito or Clarence Thomas? [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am by Amy Howe
And indeed, when the court finally released its opinion in Dobbs on June 24, five members of the court – Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – concluded “that Roe and Casey must be overruled. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:31 am by Roger Parloff
(See, for instance, “Cassidy Hutchinson’s Testimony Changed Our Minds About Indicting Donald Trump,” as well as here, here, and here.) [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
Justice Samuel Alito filed a dissent on procedure and the merits, joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am by Michael Ehline
These included Justices John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Elena, Kagan, Samuel, Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy, Coney Barret, and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
Jackson Women’s Health Organization become the emblematic decision of its author, Justice Samuel Alito, Jr.The stark contrast between the two decisions in their rhetoric, reasoning, and results reveals a great deal about each Justice, as well as the Court that decided each case. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
Spoiler alert: that fact changes nothing about the proper analysis. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:21 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Buttressing that reasoning, in the concurring opinion that was joined by Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Neil Gorsuch emphasized that the dispute before the court involved “basic questions about self-government, equality, fair notice, federalism, and the separation of powers. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 12:29 pm
The original intent in 1789 was clearly that juries be allowed to judge the law – in fact, Samuel Chase was impeached for attempting to deprive a jury of its power to judge the law as well as the fact. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am by Helen White
In 2020, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and, at times, Brett Kavanaugh all indicated that they would have adopted the theory and its vast consequences on the emergency docket. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:13 am by Amy Howe
And that discretionary authority is not changed, Roberts continued, by another provision of federal law that makes detention mandatory. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:57 am by Amy Howe
The post Supreme Court curtails EPA’s authority to fight climate change appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Society was changing, and along with it, the expectations that people had for what it means to live a full and meaningful life.From Roe to Casey: Developing the Right of Aborti [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” It is a country whose constitution does not evolve or change to meet new circumstances and affords no protection of citizens’ privacy from government intrusion—a good operating definition of a totalitarian state.Judge Bork was nominated to serve on the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am by Radhika Rao
 Justice Samuel Alito’s caustic opinion for the court, which is virtually identical to the February draft that was leaked two months ago, resembles an angry dissent rather than a ruling that speaks for a sober majority. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:37 am by John Aloysius Cogan Jr.
He suggested that HHS changed its interpretation to reduce Medicare payments. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Jon May
After Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization was leaked to Politico, I published an article (here) that argued that unless the draft was changed, the final opinion would threaten not just reproductive rights, but a host of substantive due process rights recognized by the Court over the past 70 years. [read post]