Search for: "Sanders Associates, Inc. v. the United States" Results 21 - 40 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of the United States (recommending denial of certiorari) __________________ Docket: 07-539 Case name: Progress Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:39 am
Selected items by law firms recently posted on the InternetSource: Lexology in cooperation with the Association of Corporate Counsel[Click on caption to access item posted on the Internet]Court, not arbitrator, decides contract formation question in the arbitration contextKelley Drye & Warren LLPAlfred Janiga has lived and worked in the United States for over 20 years since his arrival from Poland.Washington - Washington court holds statute of limitations doesn't… [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:47 am
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
City School Dist. of City of Newburgh v Hugh Stubbins & Associates, Inc. (85 NY2d 535 1995) can be distinguished because that plaintiff reviewed and approved specifications and had control during construction, giving it the functional equivalent of privity. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm by Schachtman
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am by Schachtman
  Some may find irony in the CPR’s past criticism of Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]