Search for: "Sanders v. Young et al" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
The Court of Appeals' Sept.. 2nd opinion in the case of In Ronald Sanders, Paul Hardin, Dallas Kelp, et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm
Davis et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, and SEC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Sarah Huckabee Sanders The Doobie-ous Redaction Award: U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:08 am
Holy Land Foundation, et al., says he believes in the maxim "justice delayed is justice denied. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
” •    Although studies have shown modest reductions in some vitamins and other nutrients after pasteurization of milk, these changes are insignificant according to a review by Potter et al (1984), human nutrition studies have shown no advantage of raw over pasteurized milk. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]