Search for: "Sandra Dobbs" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Solum, Original Public Meaning, (Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2023, No. 807).Liz Tobin-Tyler, Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: Maternal Health Policy After Dobbs, (Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 53, 2023).Carlo A. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Bruen) and one repudiating abortion rights (Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 11:15 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
If the Court strikes down abortion rights in Dobbs, for example, states’ responses will vary. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm by James Romoser
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor announces the opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:10 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Something like the leak of the Dobbs opinion draft would have been "unthinkable" during that time. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
By the time the other (Mazzone) graduated in 1997, just nine years later, Clarence Thomas had replaced Justice Thurgood Marshall (and Justices Brennan, Marshall, and Blackmun were gone) and the Rehnquist Court’s federalism revolution (led by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, whose federalism views were much sharper than those of her predecessor, Justice Potter Stewart) was underway. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:36 am by Josh Blackman
Thomas' blunt remarks suggest new antagonism toward Roberts and added to the uncertainty regarding the ultimate ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
Doubling down on that distortion in Dobbs would perpetuate those errors. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:55 am by jonathanturley
Bollinger, then-Justice Sandra Day O’Connor supplied the fifth vote to uphold the use of race by the University of Michigan. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 3:22 am by Marcia Coyle
In Dobbs, the state of Mississippi says the landmark abortion ruling, Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  He is well aware that the current Court is controlled by a majority totally unlikely to be sympathetic to his approach, as illustrated, obviously, is the Dobbs decision. [read post]