Search for: "Saylor v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2014, 2:02 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:46 am
Estate of Saylor, et al, v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 3:31 pm
In a 4-2 vote in Lance v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Lance v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
Justice Saylor dissented (Phoenixville Hospital v Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, November 21, 2013, McCaffery, S). [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:18 am
Hahn v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
For example, in State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am
Pennsylvania State Supreme CourtWebb v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:33 pm
See Thompson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:46 am
(Maj.Opinion by Saylor, J.) [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:39 am
Judge Saylor has stated he will issue a ruling to preserve the evidence to ensure his decision has force. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Allen v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Faber [v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
" Faber [v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Azzarello v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am
Cricket Lighters, 841 A.2d 1000 (Pa. 2003), three justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court (Saylor, Castile (CJ) and Eakin) joined a concurring opinion stating that Pennsylvania’s old “super-strict” liability regime in place since Azzarello v. [read post]
