Search for: "Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm
Negotiating disciplinary procedures for City of Schenectady police officers held a prohibited subject of collective bargainingCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
’" Citing Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y., Inc., 14 NY3d 46, the Appellate Division held that "the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:21 am
Procedural issues concerning the arbitrability of a grievance is for the arbitrator to resolveMatter of Board of Educ. of Schenectady City School Dist. v Schenectady Fedn. of Teachers, 61 AD3d 1175The collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Schenectady City School District and the Schenectady Federation of Teachers provided that "[a]ll teachers may be required to attend no more than three (3) evening meetings a year. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
Procedural issues concerning the arbitrability of a grievance is for the arbitrator to resolveMatter of Board of Educ. of Schenectady City School Dist. v Schenectady Fedn. of Teachers, 2009 NY Slip Op 02716, Decided on April 9, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Schenectady City School District and the Schenectady Federation of Teachers provided that "[a]ll teachers may be… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
* The decision, City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm
[See, also, Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division then held that "the repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a applies retroactively to records created prior to June 12, 2020", citing Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady, 2020 WL 7978093; 2020 NY Slip Op 34346[U]. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division then held that "the repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a applies retroactively to records created prior to June 12, 2020", citing Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady, 2020 WL 7978093; 2020 NY Slip Op 34346[U]. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
In contrast, Civil Service Law §80 neither creates a public employer's power to abolish positions nor requires it to exercise such a power.Thus, we find no conflict between the no-layoff clause under examination and any "'plain and clear prohibition in statute or controlling decision[al] law, or restrictive public policy'" that would bar arbitration of the grievance (id. at 518-519, quoting Matter of Board of Educ. of Yonkers City School Dist. v… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
The Section 207-c procedure allows an employee to dispute any specific tasks assigned to him pursuant to a light-duty assignment.The Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division’s ruling.These administrative procedures belied the union’s claim that an employee would not have meaningful review of the determination of his eligibility for light duty if he or she is not allowed to demand arbitration pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement.Also the Appellate Division noted that… [read post]
