Search for: "Scott Dodson"
Results 141 - 160
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2010, 10:43 am
In an article in the Michigan Law Review, Professor Scott Dodson acknowledges that problem and argues that the solution is to permit limited pre-dismissal discovery to give plaintiffs an opportunity to gather the facts necessary to meet the plausibility standard. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Twombly, making it more difficult for private plaintiffs to file antitrust claims against large companies; Professor Scott Dodson weighs in here at Civil Procedure Prof Blog; at Volokh Conspiracy, Einer Elhauge has these thoughts; Patti Waldmeir of the Financial Times has this story; in the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports here (subscription req'd); and Peter Lattman has this post at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
” Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Scott Dodson discusses his new book on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
(H/T: Scott Dodson). [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm
(Scott Dodson and Adam Steinman also have insightful pieces on Twombly and Iqbal — New Pleading, New Discovery” and “The Pleading Problem,” respectively). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:33 am
I am not sure either effort works--a point on which Scott Dodson, writing at Civ Pro/Fed Courts Blog, agrees). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 12:26 pm
Professor Scott Dodson, in his post “Squeezing class actions,” argues that the Supreme Court is being too restrictive in its reading of the class action prerequisites in Rule 23. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
.'"Scott Dodson (University of Arkansas) at the Civil Procedure Prof Blog:"[A]pplying a restrictive pleading standard transsubstantively will surely result in fewer meritorious cases filed, more meritorious cases dismissed, and less unlawful conduct redressed, particularly for cases in which a less restrictive standard could achieve a better balance between efficiency and justice. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 7:24 am
Rev. 1 (2008) Scott Dodson, In Search of Removal Jurisdiction, 102 Nw. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
Scott Dodson analyzes the opinion for this blog, with other coverage coming from Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST, Douglas A. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
And if Scott Dodson is right about the case pending before SCOTUS, Younger's scope is going to be explicitly more confined to such coercive proceedings. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:40 am
Ronald Mann covered the decision for this blog; commentary comes from Scott Dodson in posts at the Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog and PrawfsBlawg; he ties Dart to the Court’s 2007 decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Milyard; Scott Dodson also reported on the argument in Wood for this blog. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:18 am
October 10 will be Hamer Time at the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Abbey, Tarif Abboushi, Joanne Abel, Cortnie Abercrombie, Mitch Abrams, Julie Adams, Scott H. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:36 pm
Networking was encouraged and multiple opportunities were scheduled including a First-Time Attendee Orientation Session.Featured Summit SessionsPersonality Evaluation - Organizational anthropologist and marketing strategist Kimberly Dodson Gilbey delivered the Summit keynote address titled "How My Communication Style Can Help My Bottom Line. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:09 am
[Encore] Gregory Brothers, AutoTune and green screen viral videos; 'Fed Intruder' by Antoine Dodson watched more than a million times on YouTube; Charlie Sheen, among others. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:10 pm
" Commentators mused about Twombly's impact: our own Marty Lederman queried here whether Twombly "signal[ed] the rejection of notice pleading" altogether, Scott Dodson raised the prospect that "the Court [was] saying that Rule 8 requires ‘notice-plus' pleading"; and Michael Dorf described a "rough consensus" "that there's no way to understand the decision if it doesn't apply a… [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm
Indications are that this administration will not continue the fight to protect the 2017 law with the same vigor as the Scott administration. [read post]
