Search for: "Seagate Technology LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 7:07 am by Docket Navigator
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. et al, 2-16-cv-00538 (PAWD January 18, 2018, Order) (Bissoon, USDJ) [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬ On its face, the statute allows for broad discretion by the district courts, but the Federal Circuit set out a stricter standard for awarding of enhanced damages, as In re Seagate Technology LLC. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 1:23 am
In re Seagate Technology LLC - January 26, 2007 The Federal Circuit issued a sua sponte order on Friday to address the following questions en banc:(1) Should a party's assertion of the advice of counsel defense to willful infringement extend waiver of the attorney-client privilege to communications with that party's trial counsel? [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:56 am
Prior to this week's decision, it was also guided by a test elucidated by the Federal Circuit, as set forth in In re Seagate Technology, LLC. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
No license was reached but Convolve and MIT sued two years later when the features (allegedly) showed up in Compaq/Seagate technology. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
., Seagate Technology, LLC., and Seagate Technology, Inc. did not misappropriate 11 of 15 alleged trade secrets from Convolve, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:39 pm
”Timing of FilingsIn a March 5 statement accompanying the complaint and proposed consent order, the FTC explained the relationship of its analysis of the proposed Western Digital/Hitachi acquisition to an acquisition by Seagate Technology LLC of Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 5:39 pm by RatnerPrestia
The Federal Circuit had pronounced this test nearly a decade ago in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by Alex Gasser
  Accordingly, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s January 29, 2010 final determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-665, which found no violation of Section 337 by LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, and Seagate (US) with respect to Qimonda AG’s U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:59 am
The Complainant in this investigation is Qimonda AG and the Respondents are LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, Seagate Technologies International (Singapore), and Seagate (US) LLC (collectively “Respondents”). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:07 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Manifestó que el estándar de In re Seagate Technology, LLC id. impone una carga evidenciaría que no contempló el Congreso cuando legisló el 35 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:15 am by Dennis Crouch
Edward was a patent attorney and chief patent counsel for Alliacense Limited LLC, and previously was chief IP counsel for Seagate Technology and Control Data. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
First, on August 20, 2007, In re Seagate Technology, LLC changed the standard of willful infringement from one akin to negligence to that of objective recklessness. 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:54 am
The Complainant in this investigation is Qimonda AG ("Qimonda") and the Respondents are LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, Seagate Technologies International (Singapore), and Seagate (US) LLC (collectively "Respondents"). [read post]