Search for: "Seagate Technology LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 4:58 pm
By way of background, and as explained in our October 19, 2009 post, the Complainant in this investigation is Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”) and the Respondents are LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, Seagate Technologies International (Singapore), and Seagate (US) LLC (collectively… [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:46 am
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 17-787 Google LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
Reuters is reporting that Seagate Technology LLC has been awarded $525 million in an arbitration that it brought against Western Digital and a former Seagate employee who joined Western Digital. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:58 pm
LLC (D. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:01 am
(citing In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:54 am
June 14, 2012), available at http://www.cafc. uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinionsorders/ 10-1510.pdf (“Bard”), the Federal Circuit made clear that the objective prong of the willfulness standard set forth in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:18 pm
HTC first argued that In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm
By way of background, on November 20, 2008, Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”) filed a complaint with the ITC against LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, and Seagate (US) (collectively, “Respondents”) alleging violation of Section 337 by the importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:56 am
Id. at 3-4 (discussing first prong of the Federal Circuit’s test for establishing willful infringement under In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:02 am
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:29 pm
Seagate Tech., 764 F. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:49 am
In 2007, sitting en banc, it established a heightened standard for willfulness that included an inquiry into whether a defendant's actions were "objectively reckless" in In re Seagate Technology LLC. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
, the United States Supreme Court recently did what much of the patent world expected it would do; they overruled the Federal Circuit’s “unduly rigid” test for the awarding of enhanced damages for willful damages put in place by In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360, 1371 (2007)(en banc). [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:41 am
The Court also addressed the scope of a defendant's waiver of its attorney-client privilege and work product protection resulting from the defendant's assertion of the advice-of-counsel defense to a willful infringement claim.In In re Seagate Technology, LLC, the Court abolished the "affirmative duty of care" set forth in Underwater Devices Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 10:01 am
In In re Seagate Technology, LLC (August 20, 2007), the court made it harder for a patent owner to prove willful infringement. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
However, in the 2007 case of In re Seagate Technology, LLC (2007), the Federal Circuit held that a failure to exercise due care by obtaining an exculpatory opinion of counsel before commencing infringing activities was not in and of itself probative of whether infringement is willful. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:53 pm
., Giga-byte Technology Co., Ltd., Gracom Technologies LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Jaton Corporation, Jaton Technology TPE, Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., MSI Computer Corporation, Palit Microsystems Ltd., Pine Technology Holdings, Ltd., Sparkle Computer Co., Ltd., Nala Sales, Inc. f/k/a Zotac USA, Inc., Zotac International (MCO), Ltd., LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology,… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
” In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
"The objective baselessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees against a non-prevailing plaintiff under Brooks Furniture is identical to the objective recklessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees against an accused infringer for § 284 willful infringement actions under In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
