Search for: "Seagate Technology LLC"
Results 61 - 80
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2016, 10:15 am
Summary of Seagate two-part test for enhanced damages and the problem In In re: Seagate Technologies, LLC, the Federal Circuit previously adopted a two-part test for determining when a district court may increase damages for patent infringement pursuant to §284. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm
Currently, under the standard set out by the Federal Circuit in In re Seagate Technology LLC, an enhanced damages award under § 284 requires clear and convincing evidence that: (1) the infringer acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid patent, and (2) that this objectively-defined risk was either known or so obvious that it should have been known to the accused infringer. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:51 pm
”In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118 (2007) In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
Ford Global Technologies, LLC, et al., No. 18-264 (when is a suit dismissed on personal jurisdiction grounds barred from refiling?). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
” On April 19, 2023, BIS backed up its new enforcement philosophy when it imposed a $300 million civil penalty against California-based Seagate Technology LLC and Singapore-based Seagate International Headquarters Pte. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:55 am
” Judge Gajarsa began his opinion for the panel majority by noting that In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
Plaintiff's Failure to Seek Preliminary Injunction Sinks Willfulness Claim as to Post-Filing Conduct
15 Sep 2010, 12:09 pm
" WebMap Technologies LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:14 pm
The Court held that, under In re Seagate Tech, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
30 May 2010, 12:49 pm
In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed.Cir. 2007). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:14 am
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 17-787 (Response Requested) AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:18 am
The Court instructed the jury using the objective recklessness standard from In re Seagate Techs., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:27 am
The court therefore instructed the district court on remand to determine the amount of royalty due on the defendant's compulsory license under the patent going forward.The court briefly mentioned the issue of willful infringement after In re Seagate Technology, LLC, but only noted that there was no evidence of objective recklessness by the defendant and therefore the finding of no willful infringement was appropriate. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
William Watkins, ousted Monday at Seagate Technology LLC, is the sixth CEO of a publicly held company to be replaced in just the last eight days. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:48 am
” In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”) and the Respondents are LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, and Seagate (US) LLC (collectively, “Respondents”). [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:02 pm
Pair of cases The Court used two lower-court decisions to announce its repudiation of the Federal Circuit’s infringer-friendly approach to punitive damages in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360 (2007) (en banc). [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 1:51 pm
The Patent Reform Act of 2009 also proposes: changing the patent filing system to a first to file system; revising the prior art definition to include inventions that were "otherwise available to the public"; permitting a company to file an application on behalf of an inventor when there is an obligation to assign; eliminating interferences; expanding inter partes reexamination; codifying the 2007 In re Seagate Technology, LLC decision's standard for willful… [read post]
