Search for: "Seagate Technology LLC"
Results 81 - 100
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 8:34 am
Inc. of City of Industry, California; • Giga-byte Technology Co., Ltd., of Taiwan; • Gracom Technologies LLC of City of Industry, California; • Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California; • Hitachi Global Storage Technologies of San Jose, California; • Jaton Corporation of Fremont, California; • Jaton Technology TPE of Taiwan; • Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., of Taiwan;… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:55 am
[Disclaimer requirement of TEAM in TEAM LIVESTRONG for "Organization of sports events in the field of running, walking, cycling, and swimming; organizing community sporting events; conducting charity sporting events and tournaments" (Class 41)].In re Seagate Technology LLC, Serial No. 85007424 (August 24, 2012) [not precedential]. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 5:07 pm
IPO also supports changes to the inequitable conduct jurisprudence: IPO supports legislation to (1) limit or eliminate the unenforceability defense based upon inequitable conduct in patent litigation, (2) eliminate the requirement to disclose the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out the invention, and (3) allow enhanced patent infringement damages to be awarded for "willful" infringement only in limited circumstances, such as those set forth in IPO's Amicus Brief… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm
Inc. of City of Industry, California; Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; Gracom Technologies LLC, of City of Industry, California; Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California; Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc. of San Jose, California; Jaton Corporation of Fremont, California; Jaton Technology TPE of Hsi-Chih, Taiwan; Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. of Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; MSI Computer Corporation of City of Industry,… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:47 am
” In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court S D Texas: Yahoo’s sale of competitive keyword ads isn’t false designation of origin: Heartbrand Beef, Inc v Lobel’s of New York, LLC (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Jones Day – Jones Day, BlockShopper.com settle hyperlink trade mark suit (The… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Apple Inc., No 15-777 (design patent damages calculation) Argued: Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 12:33 pm
Seagate Tech. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm
As discussed in Lucent Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Apple Inc., No 15-777 (design patent damages calculation) Argued: Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
The decision rejects the objective-recklessness standard of Seagate (Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 4:02 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.In re Seagate Technology, LLC. (08/20/2007) (errata: LINK): please refer to Greg Duff's summary of this case, entitled "Federal Circuit Clarifies Willfulness Standard" available here: LINKOrmco Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 10:39 pm
Fiber Composites, LLC (01/26/2007): appeal of claim construction supporting jury decision of infringement, discussion of six patents relating to composite materials made from a combination of polymer and wood fiber and to the use of those composites to produce structural parts, support for initial claim construction found within the patent specification and the prosecution history, claim language "must be read consistently with the totality of the patent's applicable prosecution… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
As discussed in Lucent Technologies, Inc., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 5:35 pm
(e^ip note: critical to understand in initial claim drafting and prior art analysis)In re Seagate Technology, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:00 pm
In 2007, the In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:23 am
In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:05 am
In both cases, the Federal Circuit held that enhanced damages were not available under that court’s 2007 decision in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, which permits enhanced damages only upon clear and convincing evidence of objectively reckless willfulness. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 6:35 am
Paice LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
" iLOR, LLC v. [read post]
