Search for: "Searle v. Martin"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
Book Review: Arnold reviews "Economic Approaches to Intellectual Property"This new book by Kat Dr Nicola Searle and Martin Brassell provides an introduction to the economics of intellectual property for lawyers, managers and policymakers. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Searle Co., 423 N.E.2d 831, 838 (Ohio 1981); Menard v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
AmeriKat Annsley refers to the report written by Martin O’Connor (Addisons) on the recent case of Upaid Systems Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 4) [2016] FCA 1514 where the Federal Court of Australia recently grappled with the issue. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Lasky, 723 N.E.2d 544, 549 (N.Y. 1999); Martin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
See Larkin v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 764 N.E.2d 35, 42 (Ill. 2002) (applied to medical device); Martin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Searle v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:06 pm
Philips v Asustek and HTCGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy cuts her patent litigation teeth on smartphones - She had a wave of nostalgia delving into the acronyms of mobile telecommunications standards in the recent Court of Appeal decision of Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Asustek Computer Incorporation, HTC Corporation and others [2017] EWCA Civ 1526. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Lederle Laboratories, 732 P.2d 297, 306-07 (Idaho 1987).Illinois: Martin v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:29 am
The case was that of Rebekah Johnson v Les Editions De L’avenir SA, involving a bungee jumping video which appears on YouTube. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
E.g., Elliott v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
