Search for: "Searles v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2012, 3:56 am
Fellow Kat Nicola Searle (the Katonomist) ventures across the border from Scotland to speak, while 1709 Blogger Iona Harding comes from even further afield as she returns from Canada to make her contribution. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cornish Glennroy Blair-Ford v CRS Adventures Ltd [2012] EWHC 2360 (QB) (13 August 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Nicklinson, R (on the application of) v Ministry Of Justice [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin) (16 August 2012) Albion Water Ltd, R (on the application of) v Water Services Regulation Authority [2012] EWHC 2259 (Admin) (16 August 2012) Searle & Anor v Secretary of State for Communities and… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Watson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Watson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:32 pm
Watson v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
United States: Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former head of the IMF, has filed a countersuit of defamation against the hotel maid who accused him of sexual assault. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:04 pm
Business v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Searle & Co., 630 F. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:21 pm
On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in National Meat Association v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm
The IPKat's excellent and scholarly friend Norman Siebrasse tells him that he has recently become aware of a recent Canadian decision, Nazerali v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Searle & Co., 705 F. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
Law on International Commercial Arbitration and served as the Chair of the Arbitration Task Force of the Searle Civil Justice Institute. – In a press release dated the same day as the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
Searle & Co. 358 F.3d 916, 919-20 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Searle & Co., 748 F. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 9:32 pm
Sometime later a state trooper arrived and stopped his vehicle behind ours with its lights flashing. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
