Search for: "Sears Roebuck "
Results 221 - 240
of 433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1549 (Fed. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:03 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 15 (1994). [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:53 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co. (1980) 110 Cal.App.3d 740, 746, 757 [ordering a remittitur of punitive damages to $2.5 million, resulting in a ratio of 15.8 to one].) [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 6:48 pm
When we were invited to solicit the Sears, Roebuck account I bearded their board of directors by myself. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm
Sears Roebuck and Company. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 8:50 am
” When Sears Roebuck & Co. employee Wanda Glenn was diagnosed with a heart condition and applied for plan disability benefits, Met Life initially concluded that Glenn’s claim was valid, and encouraged her to also apply for Social Security benefits. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co. nicely complements this decision [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 505 F.3d 993, 994 (9th Cir. 2007) (emphasis omitted); see also Munson, 522 F.3d at 1002 (certifying a question to the California Supreme Court, and having that certified question accepted, where our court was "in doubt about whether the California Supreme Court would follow" an earlier state intermediate appellate court decision). [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 1:45 am
Sears Roebuck and Co., 664 S.E.2d 569 (N.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:16 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 417 F.3d 789, 804 (7th Cir. 2005).Xodus simply failed to introduce enough convincing evidence that Wackenhut was aware of his religion which provides an important lesson to most any plaintiff in employment cases: you must let the employer know of your protected class! [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:32 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 18 (1994). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co, No. 143329. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:57 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542 (Fed. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 6:20 am
§ 1407, Unopposed by Class Action Plaintiffs, but Orders Class Actions Transferred to Eastern District of Wisconsin, Where none of the Class Actions had been Filed Twenty-three (23) class actions were filed in 18 federal district courts against numerous defendants, including inter alia Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Co., Kawasaki Motors, and The Kohler Co.; the class action complaints alleged “manufacturers of lawnmowers and/or lawnmower engines… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 2:51 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 138 N.J. 2, 14 (1994) (quoting Senate Committee, Statement to the Senate Bill No. 199 [1960].) [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:39 am
Sears, Roebuck & Company, 792 N.E.2d 145 (Mass. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:36 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., In Re Walgreen Co. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1546 (Fed. [read post]
From Cedar Grove, NJ: US patent application 20150148720 titled Discreet Sexual Stimulation Apparatus
29 May 2015, 9:04 am
The home versions soon became extremely popular, with advertisements in periodicals such as Needlecraft, Woman's Home Companion, Modern Priscilla, and the Sears, Roebuck catalog; however, these disappeared in the 1920s, apparently because their appearance in pornography made it no longer tenable for mainstream society to avoid the sexual connotations of the devices. [0006] In the 1960's the modern "personal" vibrator re-emerged as a by-product of the sexual… [read post]
