Search for: "Seattle v. Marshall"
Results 81 - 100
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
& Associates Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 8:18 pm
Supreme Court of State of Washington Strengthens Batson On July 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington rendered an opinion in City of Seattle v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:35 am
The Supreme Court reached a decision today in Riley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The chief justice announces that Sotomayor has the opinion today in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:03 pm
Its role in the Apple case is framed by a 1977 Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Question: You write of Justice John Marshall Harlan’s famous solo dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Corey Robin in connection with Robin’s new book, “The Enigma of Clarence Thomas” (Metropolitan Books, 2019). [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:14 am
"Brown v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Regulatory Discretion Fosters Clean Tech September 18, 2023 | Shon Hiatt, USC Marshall School of Business, and Jake B. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25] Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26] Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Department of Veterans Affairs (Retaliation)Cavalier v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
Porro v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm
"] From the Plea Agreement filed last week in U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm
The category’s importance is not the severity of the punishment; other charges can usually be marshaled to achieve an identical sentence. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
You may recall that President Trump attacked the federal judge in Seattle who enjoined the travel ban. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
In another opinion, striking down Seattle’s school desegregation plan because it involved racial balancing, he insisted, against all experience, that “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race” (10). [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Finally, a heavy hammer slams down on the “failures of the Supreme Court to fulfill its duty to (in John Marshall’s words) ‘say what the law is. [read post]
