Search for: "Second Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
Employer can avoid disparate-impact liability based evidence that its test was validRicci Et Al. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 1:23 pm
Second, if the employee was at-fault and others are injured, those injured persons may seek compensation from the employer by alleging vicarious liability (via the legal theory of “respondeat superior,” which is Latin for, “Let the Master Answer”) or for direct liability (i.e., inadequate training, negligent hiring, inadequate supervision, unsafe equipment, etc.). [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:53 am
Although the Restatement (Second) of Torts included provisions allowing for the imposition of such liability in certain cases, Massachusetts had not adopted said provisions. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:48 am
The issue raised in this case is how do you assign liability when the employer is told by a third party to fire the plaintiff? [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:55 am
Gristedes Operating Corp. et al., Case No. 11-4035, affirming the Southern District of New York’s imposition of individual “employer” liability on New York City mayoral candidate and supermarket owner and executive John Catsimatidis for settlement payments arising from a Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) class action litigation. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:22 pm
” But the court didn’t buy the workers’ argument, noting that the Wage Order’s second phrase—“exercises control over”—limited the scope of agency liability to actual agency or actual control over their employment. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
Given these facts, the Second Circuit decided that “a rational jury could find, under the totality of the circumstances” that the director of Human Resources “exercised sufficient control over Graziadio’s employment to be subject to liability under the FMLA. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:19 am
It has long been the rule in the Second Circuit, that individual supervisors do not have liability under Title VII claims, based on the case of Tomka v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Beyond the storyline, the case presents analysis of liability of predecessor/subsequent attorneys, how the dissolution of a partnership affects legal malpractice litigation, what subsequent attorneys can accomplish in the Second Circuit, and potential liability of associate attorneys. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:05 am
For further information on this please click here The second case involved the case of Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:56 am
Nonetheless, the case leaves open the possibility that the level of operational control this CEO exercised is not the floor for individual liability in other cases. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:16 am
Hearing about a new case out of the Second Circuit, it would be easy to conclude the Court was getting into the superhero business with the establishment of a new theory of liability in harassment cases entitled the “alter-ego” or “proxy” theory. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:16 am
Hearing about a new case out of the Second Circuit, it would be easy to conclude the Court was getting into the superhero business with the establishment of a new theory of liability in harassment cases entitled the “alter-ego” or “proxy” theory. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:49 am
This case illustrates the extensive confusion that can arise when determining liability in North Carolina car accident cases. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
In this case, the Board stated that the medical opinions had established the employee suffered an injury to her right shoulder while working for the second employer. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:56 am
In any lawsuit imputing liability to an employer, the court will make two inquiries. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
The second theory the plaintiff cited was a negligent hiring/supervision claim. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 11:03 am
In such case, the Director of Employment Standards will employ section 96(1) to issue a determination against one or more directors or officers of the corporate employer to obtain payment of wages owed to the employee by the corporate employer. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 11:03 am
In such case, the Director of Employment Standards will employ section 96(1) to issue a determination against one or more directors or officers of the corporate employer to obtain payment of wages owed to the employee by the corporate employer. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:23 am
Nelson and Tyrrell filed lawsuits in state court in Montana under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, a federal law that allows railroad workers to sue their employers when they are injured. [read post]
