Search for: "Secretary of Interior v. California"
Results 81 - 100
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2009, 5:32 pm
This determination may require the agency to consult with either the Secretary of Commerce or the Secretary of Interior. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 2:53 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:37 pm
” Both of those fundamental questions are at issue in the case of Salazar (Interior Secretary) v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:25 pm
” In contrast, the Act defines “States” to include, in part, “any federally recognized Indian tribe as defined by the Secretary of the Interior. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Lew, Secretary of the Treasury, et al., 795 F.3d 48 (D.C. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 1:20 am
Alaska Oil & Gas Assn. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:48 am
Butte Environmental Council v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 11:01 am
Riverside County Transportation Comm. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:41 am
In his initial ruling in 2019, (Citizens for Clean Energy v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
California Health and Welfare Agency. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 1:36 pm
” (Quoting Leavitt v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:32 pm
Code, sections 65590, 65590.1) and the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Pub. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Department of the Interior The Twitter-Assist Award: President Donald Trump It’s not often that prying documents out of the CIA comes with a little bit of help from the commander in chief. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Department of the Interior The Twitter-Assist Award: President Donald Trump It’s not often that prying documents out of the CIA comes with a little bit of help from the commander in chief. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
On the one hand, 12 Members of Congress from Central and Southern California and Senator Diane Feinstein (all Democrats) signed a letter to the Secretary of the Interior and Governor Brown in May 2013 expressing their “continued support for the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) process” and how “half measures” are unacceptable. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:14 am
Supreme Court decision in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
Phase 1 began on Feb. 19 with a group of 25 asylum seekers entering the San Ysidro Port of Entry in California, and on Feb. 25, the government began processing asylum seekers out of Matamoros, after nearly two years surviving in the encampment there. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Jewell 14-402Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioners in this case.Issue: (1) Whether the Secretary of the Interior, when concluding that a federal agency action will jeopardize a species listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, must address in the administrative record the economic and technical feasibility of proposed “reasonable and prudent… [read post]
