Search for: "See v. Com." Results 41 - 60 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 5:44 am by Eugene Volokh
The city may impose some content-neutral speech restrictions that apply equally to all signs (though some such signs have to be allowed, see City of Ladue v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Could make the entire survey about .com terms, so all the educational section and examples would be about .com. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
(See Stats. 1973, ch. 1007, § 8, p. 2004; Stats. 1972, ch. 1122, § 13, p. 2156; see generally Industrial Welfare Com. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 1:48 pm
Because we see so many crashes, it is always worrisome to see a person we knew before the crash and it hits a little closer to home. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:05 pm
Like “Dick”:http://www.burningdoor.com/askthewizard/2007/09/lessons_learned_obviously_its.html, I struggled to see the value in Twitter. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
This is because, upon seeing the signs, the Court assumes that“many consumers will refer to the mark … by the word ‘france’ alone, as the abbreviation ‘.com’ will be perceived as referring to a website” (citing judgment of 13 December 2007, Xentral v OHIM — Pages jaunes (PAGESJAUNES.COM), T‑134/06, EU:T:2007:387, paragraphs 56 and 61). [read post]