Search for: "Seiko Epson Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2020, 1:25 am by Rose Hughes
Epson sued Calidad for infringement of their Australian patents (AU 2009233643 and AU 2013219239) covering the cartridges (Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2020] HCA 41). [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 11:45 pm by Mark Summerfield
Recently, I wrote about the decision of the High Court in Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2020] HCA 41, with particular focus on the Court’s finding, by a 4-3 majority, that the first sale of a patented product exhausts the patentee’s exclusive rights in that product. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:29 pm by Mark Summerfield
In a significant judgment, the High Court of Australia has changed an aspect of patent law in Australia, ruling by a 4-3 majority that the first sale of a patented product exhausts the patentee’s exclusive rights in that product: Calidad Pty Ltd v Seiko Epson Corporation [2020] HCA 41. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 2:08 am by Helen Macpherson (AU)
Facts of the case The respondent, Seiko Epson Corporation, sold printer cartridges for inkjet printers, known as ‘Epson’ cartridges. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 2:08 am by Helen Macpherson (AU)
Facts of the case The respondent, Seiko Epson Corporation, sold printer cartridges for inkjet printers, known as ‘Epson’ cartridges. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 12:33 am by John Collins
The original Epson cartridges vs Calidad’s “repurposed” cartridges The case involved Seiko Epson Corporation’s (Seiko) “EPSON” branded printer cartridges that embodied the invention in two Australian Patents (Seiko Patents). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 6:56 am by Randy Shaheen
Epson argued that it included a disclosure at the bottom of each site stating: “3LCD is a marketing organization created and run by Seiko Epson Corporation to promote 3LCD technology and educate consumers about its benefits. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From a post by Michelle Blythe at Lexology on the Australian case Seiko Epson Corporation v Calidad Pty Ltd [2017] FCA1403. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 8:39 pm by Mark Summerfield
  Seiko Epson Corporation v Calidad Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1403 concerns the collection, refurbishment, and refilling of ink cartridges for Epson-branded printers outside Australian jurisdiction, and subsequent importation and sale of the refilled cartridges by Calidad. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Steve Brachmann
Headquartered in Nagano, Japan, the Seiko Epson Corporation is a worldwide leader in the manufacture of computer printers, imaging equipment and other information technologies. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Steve Brachmann
Headquartered in Nagano, Japan, the Seiko Epson Corporation is a worldwide leader in the manufacture of computer printers, imaging equipment and other information technologies. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:11 pm by Eric Schweibenz
., Ltd. and Ninestar US’s (collectively, “Ninestar”) request for an advisory opinion; (B) Ninestar’s petition for modification of the GEO and the cease and desist order directed to Ninestar US (“CDO”); and (C) a petition by Complainants Epson Portland Inc., Epson America, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation (collectively, “Epson”) for modification of the GEO and CDO. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:15 pm by Eric Schweibenz
., Ltd. of Korea Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan Shuttle Inc. of Taiwan Systemax Inc. of Port Washington, New York Additionally, Chief ALJ Charles E. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm by Alex Gasser
  On February 3, 2011, the Complainants in the underlying investigation, Epson Portland, Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon, Epson America, Inc. of Long Beach, California, and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan (collectively “Epson”) filed a petition to modify the GEO to indicate that components of certain ink cartridges were covered by the orders. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:39 pm by Eric Schweibenz
., Ltd. of Korea Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan Shuttle Inc. of Taiwan Systemax Inc. of Port Washington, New York According to the complaint, TPL is the exclusive licensee of the asserted patents, all of which are generally directed to flash memory readers. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:33 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the underlying investigation was requested by Complainants Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson America, Inc., and Epson Portland Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm by Vincent LoTempio
List of the top 10 company's to receive a US patent in 2011: International Business Machines (US) 6180 Samsung (Korea) 4894 Canon K K (Japan) 2821 Panasonic Corp (Japan) 2559 Toshiba (Japan) 2483 Microsoft Corp Corporation (US) 2311 Sony Corporation (Japan) 2286 Seiko Epson Corp (Japan) 1533 Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by almaraz
Audio recordings of the arguments can be found from the links below. 2011-1120 Seiko Epson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,008,053 entitled INK CARTRIDGE AND RECORDING APPARATUS and owned by Seiko Epson. [read post]