Search for: "Sellers v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2021, 7:00 am by Riley Macdonald
Default Judgment Entered Against Seller of Nintendo Switch Jailbreak Nintendo of America Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
On December 8, 2015, the Second Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
  The RSIB states that the Louisiana Sales and Use Tax Commission for Remote Sellers (the “Commission”) “will not seek to enforce any sales or use tax collection obligation on remote sellers based on United States Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 1:54 pm by megan
 Bills being considered by both houses of the United States Congress may change that for certain remote sellers. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 12:59 pm by Schachtman
My friend Chris Guzelian thinks that I have jumped the shark in joining with Professors Makuch and Lash in filing an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:05 am by Jody Coultas
Amazon.com, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 17-35173, 06 August 2018 appeared first on Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:43 am by John Rich and Beth L. Fowler
In a long awaited decision reversing 26 years of existing precedent, on June 21st the United States Supreme Court ruled in South Dakota  v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm by Series of Essays
Brnovich and Its Implications September 20, 2021 | Joshua Sellers, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law The Supreme Court’s decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:47 pm by Vandenack Weaver LLC
Pieper Since the dawn of the Internet, online sellers have benefited from a line of United States Supreme Court precedent that prevented states from requiring out-of-state businesses to collect and remit sales tax on sales in states where the seller has no “physical presence. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
United States, the Court appeared to have a sense of déjà vu. [read post]