Search for: "Seward v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 11:35 am by Randall Hodgkinson
MinihanFailure to instruct on voluntary intoxicationImproper comment about "mug shot"State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), January 15, 2007 For your information we are posting the entire New York Legislature 2007 Chapter Law List as retrieved from the New York Legislative Retrieval System on January 15, 2008. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Welfare, No. 06-4628 In an employment-discrimination suit against a state agency, denial of a motion to dismiss is reversed where: 1) by voluntarily removing the matter from state to federal court, the state had waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in a federal forum; but 2) a removing state retains all defenses it would have enjoyed had the matter been litigated in state court, including immunity from liability. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:09 am by Inga Caldwell
Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 N.Y.3d 553, 559 (2009). [5] See generally Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
Bryant, although the internet citation of Ashmore v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599 A7936 Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598 A7905 Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597 A7892 Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in… [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]