Search for: "Sharp v. Commissioner of"
Results 1 - 20
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2021, 9:24 pm
Ltd v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 643, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v Sandoz Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 947. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 5:44 pm
On 29 October 2019 the Court of Appeal (Etherton MR, Sharp P and McFarlane P) made an order withdrawing the reference to the CJEU in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers ([2018] EWCA Civ 1780) . [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:55 pm
The objective test applies if the person knows, “or a reasonable person in the position of the person would know”, that the transaction is likely to avoid or significantly reduce the amount of employee entitlements which can be recovered;[8] introducing a new civil compensation provision to provide a mechanism to compensate those who have suffered loss or damage as a result of contraventions to the civil penalty provision;[9] expanding the list of parties who can commence civil… [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 1:47 am
Epic Games v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 11:30 pm
Sharp, Xiaomi v InterDigital, and Samsung v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 7:54 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Garside v Black Horse Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 190 (QB) (12 February 2010) Pankhurst v White [2010] EWHC 311 (QB) (18 February 2010) Malone & Ors v British Airways Plc [2010] EWHC 302 (QB) (19 February 2010) Sabin v BRB (Residuary) Ltd [2010] EWHC 267 (QB) (19 February 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Thomas & Anor v BPE Solicitors (A Firm) [2010] EWHC 306 (Ch) (19 February 2010) Royal Society for the… [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
In last month’s unanimous judgment in Rothschild v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2013] EWCA Civ 197) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the defence of justification had been established in a claim brought by the financier Nat Rothschild against the Daily Mail. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm
The Information Commissioner has opened a formal investigation into the use of data analytics for political purposes. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Cir. 1996) (“[T]he broadest of the PTO’s rulemaking powers . . . does NOT grant the Commissioner the author- ity to issue substantive rules. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 8:19 am
Lucia Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:07 am
With a new commissioner confirmed in September, the Commission once again has five commissioners. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In the same way that Collins is undermined by the subequent decisions in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015), so Murphy is undermined by the subsequent decisions in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) and Case… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Robert Sharp, also of English PEN, has dissected some of the detail here and here. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:36 pm
The insurers promised, after Hurricane Andrew, to bring stability in prices and availability if states (including Florida and Texas, where I was commissioner) gave them the three things they demanded: much higher rates based on models, sharp cuts in coverage, such as deductibles, and pools (like Citizens) where they could dump high risks and keep profitable risks for themselves. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 9:39 am
Matthias Zigann) granted Sharp an injunction against Daimler (which triggered a settlement, see 1, 2), as did the 21st Civil Chamber in a Conversant v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
Ireland The Data Protection Commissioner (DPC), has opened a third privacy investigation into Apple. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
Sharp LJ answered them in favour of the authority. [read post]
