Search for: "Sharpe v. Martin" Results 41 - 60 of 198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2007, 5:49 pm
  So don't make up rationales for protecting all of us from legal speech.Yours truly,Your Friends on the Second CircuitNow, Chairman Martin has already responded, saying (weirdly, in my view) that "this really supports a la carte for cable. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by David Post
A letter from the league to [Haupt’s lawyer] last year provided a sharp warning to Haupt. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Wright [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
On 9 July 2021 Kenneth Martin J handed down judgment in the case of Nguyen v Hinsley [2021] WASC 220, striking out multiple parts of the defence and counterclaim, with leave to replead. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:18 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Justices Karakatsanis, Brown and Martin dissent, substantially for the reasons of Sharpe J.A. at the Court of Appeal. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
 We had a post by Martin Moore of the Media Standards Trust. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation Martin Hockridge is expected to go on trial at Westminster Magistrates Court on 8 November 2021 over an incident involving BBC journalist Nick Watt in June 2021. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) Cruddas v Calvert, heard 9, 10 and 11 December 2014 (Jackson, Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ) OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"It was error to dismiss the first cause of action merely because plaintiff is not entitled to the declaration he seeks (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], cert denied 371 US 901 [1962]); the proper course is to declare in favor of defendants (see Holliswood Care Ctr. v Whalen, 58 NY2d 1001, 1004 [1983]; Mongelli v Sharp, 140 AD2d 273 [1988]). [read post]