Search for: "Shed v. Amazon" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2021, 5:08 am by Eleonora Rosati
Specifically, the court considered that use of the mark in third-party ads displayed on Amazon’s marketplace relating to counterfeit goods and the subsequent shipment of such items by Amazon through its own FBA programme constituted direct infringement by the platform itself.The decision was partly reversed on appeal last year (Court of Appeal of Brussels (9th Chamber), Amazon Europe Core sàrl, Amazon EU sàrl and Amazon Services Europe… [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:57 am by Eric Goldman
Amazon The post Another Tough Ruling for Print-on-Demand Vendors–Sid Avery v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
In today’s roundup, Scott Riddle (loooong-time LXBN author) sheds light on a case that may invalidate thousands of Georgia foreclosures. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2021, Oxford County Court handed down judgment in Fairhurst v Woodard (Case No: G00MK161). [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:10 pm
The Commercial Tribunal of Lyon sheds light on the right to paternity in a case involving…light design creations. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
(more on the Wahaha v Danone dispute): (China Business Law Blog), What Global Players could learn from Wii v Vii [Nintendo's global new product launch mistakes]: (IPDragon), (China Law Blog), Junk Patents: (China Hearsay),Has your distributor (representative, manufacturer) in China registered your mark? [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
Donziger is an extension of the civil RICO case of Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
From £5.42 (paperback) and £75.77 (hard cover) via Amazon UK (here). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
| Brussels court grants Louboutin inhibitory decision against Amazon | Planet Art v Photobox passing off: no compunction when refusing injunction | On economic analysis of IP law: an interview with professor Tom Cotter | Calls for holistic reforms to digital platforms from Australia’s competition regulator | Enterprise name vs. trade mark: throwing a straw against the wind? [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 5:43 am
The court found in favour of Maradona, awarding damages amounting to EUR 70,000.PatentsAnnsley Merelle Ward reported on the decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal in Teva v Gilead. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am by admin
Gonzaga High – it’s akin to rushing river v. water fountain. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:42 am by Andres
This was well established in Perfect 10 v Amazon, where an adult-content website sued Amazon and Google for posting thumbnails and inline pictures of their content. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:41 am by Eric Goldman
In contrast, the Herbal Brands case cleanly deals with the common situation of an Amazon merchant selling in the Amazon marketplace. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Blog has considered whether studying lived experience – without losing sight of its social, technical and political dimensions – can shed light on the tensions between desires of expanded experience and technological transparency. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
    How the exoneration of business users must be practically implementedIn Amazon, the CJEU indicated its preference for the implementation of “a priori” exemptions of business users from payment of private copying levies. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Amazon v Tejan-Kella before Murray J. [read post]