Search for: "Sheehan v. U.s"
Results 1 - 20
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Smith, 490 U.S. 794 (1989). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Bauer (Assistant Professor, Department of Journalism and Creative Media, The University of Alabama) Expert Statement Lee Bebout (Professor of English, Arizona State University) “Weaponizing Victimhood in U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm
Sheehan: Excessive force case. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
~Thomas Jefferson, 1789 To underscore these points, the Framers provided in Article V, not just one but two methods (and four paths) for amendment. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
On June 30, 1971 — 17 days after Sheehan’s first article — the justices ruled 6-3 in New York Times v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm
In the U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:32 am
Times v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
U.S. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm
Graham, 490 U.S. at 396. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Stark, U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, in People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
" Rosado v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Hinman, U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Professor Beck argued before the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
The en banc U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Sheehan, but dismissed it as improvidently granted. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
” See, e.g., Porter v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
