Search for: "Sheeran v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
Readers may remember the case of Ed Sheeran and Sam Chokri, discussed by this Kat back in August 2018 here. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 4:28 am
”**** * see Matter of Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp., 68 AD3d 1199 and Matter of Birnbaum v New York State Dept. of Labor, 75 AD3d 707 ** DOT and DOL both claimed that 4 NYCRR 21.3 and Article 30 of the relevant collective bargaining agreements between the union and the employers in support of their decisions. *** CSL §73 permits a public employer to terminate an employee who has been continuously absent from work for… [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Worden explains that the New York State Court of Appeals decided two cases, Sheeran v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:55 am
Show notes are located at www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/147 ED SHEERAN GETS AWARD OF COST “THE” OHIO STATE GETS TRADEMARK FOR “THE” FYRE TV PORN COMPANY CLAIMS REVERSE PASSING OFF, ETC., AGAINST AMAZONCOPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD CONFIRMS STREAMING ROYALTY RAISE FOR PUBLISHERS AND SONGWRITERSCOURT REJECTS ROY MOORE’S DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST SACHA BARON COHENPRACTICE TIP: CANADA EXTENDS COPYRIGHT FOR MUSICAL WORKS BY 20 YEARSSupreme… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
Sheeran. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:41 am
Carl Schmitt Scott Sheeran, Human rights and derogation in peacekeeping: addressing a legal vacuum within the state of exception Diane A. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
Sheeran. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am
This will have a direct impact of the decision on Ed Sheeran "Let's Get it On" v "Thinking Out Loud" case [Katpost here], where Sheeran's lawyers argued that the Let's Get It On deposit defines the scope of protection, but Townsend's team argued that the composition is embodied on the Gaye recording. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Matter of Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp., 18 NY3d 61 [Decided with Birnbaum v NYS Department of Labor], the procedural safeguards set out in Civil Service Law §72.1 are available to an employee if employer bars his or her return to work from sick leave. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:30 am
It builds up tension (I-IV-V) and then Resolves it (V-I). [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
" However, in the one case where the matter has been argued, the result was inconclusive (Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch. 587.) [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:07 am
New York State Department of Transportation, and Birnbaum v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:17 am
Ltd v Aiwa Corp. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
Sheeran and other claimants are seeking negative declaratory relief that they had not infringed the defendants’ copyright. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
As Janer prepares to test the defense in Bay County, a state Court of Appeals is grappling with the same issues in the case of People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
This one may take you a little while to get through, but it's worth it: United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
** See Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:22 am
[On a side note, comparing this to the Sheeran v Switch case - Switch went for varying degrees of both approaches in that they argued the two had mutual friends and that the 'Oh Why' song was on several platforms, but his YouTube video only has 41,122 views and there's no Grammy nomination...]But back to the matter at hand - having convinced the Court that there was a reasonable possibility that the writers had access to the work, the next question was… [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 10:37 pm
Following this Kat's post on the Ed Sheeran copyright infringement case relating to the song "Shape of You" (here), she came across another similar dispute going on over the pond! [read post]
