Search for: "Sheeran v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:30 am
It builds up tension (I-IV-V) and then Resolves it (V-I). [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:30 am
The case Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:22 am
[On a side note, comparing this to the Sheeran v Switch case - Switch went for varying degrees of both approaches in that they argued the two had mutual friends and that the 'Oh Why' song was on several platforms, but his YouTube video only has 41,122 views and there's no Grammy nomination...]But back to the matter at hand - having convinced the Court that there was a reasonable possibility that the writers had access to the work, the next question was… [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 10:37 pm
Following this Kat's post on the Ed Sheeran copyright infringement case relating to the song "Shape of You" (here), she came across another similar dispute going on over the pond! [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
" However, in the one case where the matter has been argued, the result was inconclusive (Francis Day & Hunter Ltd v Bron [1963] Ch. 587.) [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:28 am
Just a little bit more pressure and all would be under control.Then, when the landmark MGM Studios v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am
Stay motion Judge Spath moves on to the defense’s “motion to abate pending the resolution of the United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:41 am
Carl Schmitt Scott Sheeran, Human rights and derogation in peacekeeping: addressing a legal vacuum within the state of exception Diane A. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:33 pm
In further support of her argument, the wife cited In re Sheeran 369 B.R. 910 (E.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Worden explains that the New York State Court of Appeals decided two cases, Sheeran v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
** See Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Matter of Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp., 18 NY3d 61 [Decided with Birnbaum v NYS Department of Labor], the procedural safeguards set out in Civil Service Law §72.1 are available to an employee if employer bars his or her return to work from sick leave. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
Sheeran. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
Sheeran. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:07 am
New York State Department of Transportation, and Birnbaum v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 1:08 am
http://j.st/GuD Matter of Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp.; Matter of Michelle Birnbaum v New York State Dept. of LaborCourt: New York Court of Appeals Docket: 196, 195 November 17, 2011 Judge: Pigott Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law Petitioners brought these Article 78 proceedings to challenge, among other things, their placement on involuntary leave… [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 4:28 am
”**** * see Matter of Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp., 68 AD3d 1199 and Matter of Birnbaum v New York State Dept. of Labor, 75 AD3d 707 ** DOT and DOL both claimed that 4 NYCRR 21.3 and Article 30 of the relevant collective bargaining agreements between the union and the employers in support of their decisions. *** CSL §73 permits a public employer to terminate an employee who has been continuously absent from work for… [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
http://j.st/GhD United States v. [read post]
