Search for: "Shields v. Clark"
Results 1 - 20
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2017, 12:35 pm
Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield, 152 F. 3d 67, 71–72 (CA2 1998); Pine View Gardens, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
The case is Thompson v. [read post]
Deborah Tuerkheimer’s Judging Sex & The En Banc Opinion That Reversed The Rape Shield Killing Ruling
17 May 2012, 7:06 am
Deborah Tuerkheimer’s Judging Sex & The En Banc Opinion That Reversed The Rape Shield Killing RulingBack in 2010, I posted an entry about the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Gagne v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm
” Blow cites the 1989 case of Graham v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 11:24 am
Judge Weinstein emphasizes the difference, presumably to try to shield his decision from reversal after Clark is decided. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 11:24 am
Judge Weinstein emphasizes the difference, presumably to try to shield his decision from reversal after Clark is decided. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:24 pm
Today the Court rejected that argument, and affirmed the decision of the Seventh Circuit, in a unanimous and straightforward eleven-page opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor in Clark v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:08 am
See Wengui v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 4:02 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in Fordyce v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 11:45 pm
Clark, Jr. for the lead.] [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
In Crane v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
REV. 1263, 1270-71, 1288-89 (2020); Seth Kreimer, Rays Of Sunlight in a Shadow “War”: FOIA, The Abuses of Anti-Terrorism, and the Strategy of Transparency, 11 LEWIS & CLARK L. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:45 am
In the case of Clark v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 11:20 pm
Also yesterday in Holy See v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
Gagne v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:53 pm
Clark St. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 9:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
Clark v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 9:03 am
., et al v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:14 pm
This waiver of attorney-client privilege was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Clark v. [read post]
